The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (2025)

Space and PhysicsAstronomy

PUBLISHED

It might not have been just a minor geomagnetic storm that affected the atmosphere, as it was claimed.

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (3)

Dr. Alfredo Carpineti

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (4)
Dr. Alfredo Carpineti

Senior Staff Writer & Space Correspondent

  • email

Alfredo (he/him) has a PhD in Astrophysics on galaxy evolution and a Master's in Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces.

BookView full profileBookRead IFLScience Editorial Policy

Senior Staff Writer & Space Correspondent

  • email

EditedbyHolly Large

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (5)
Holly Large

Jr Copy Editor & Staff Writer

  • email

Holly is a graduate medical biochemist with an enthusiasm for making science interesting, fun and accessible.

BookView full profileBookRead IFLScience Editorial Policy

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (6)3Comments

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (7)

On February 3, 2022, SpaceX launched 49 Starlink satellites. Within days, the vast majority of them were lost, raining back down across the Caribbean. At the time, Elon Musk’s company blamed a modest geomagnetic storm that took place at roughly the same time. But the real culprit might have been a much more complex and fundamental event inside the Sun.

The cause of this failure was that the atmosphere was more puffed up than expected. While its density is pretty low, the atmosphere of the Earth is so large that it has been argued that no astronaut has ever left it. When a geomagnetic storm happens, following some solar event, a lot of energy is thrown into the atmosphere, which heats up and expands. This process increases the density of the upper layers – not enough for a human to survive there, but enough for the drag to affect a satellite’s speed.

With less speed, satellites drop in altitude. At a lower altitude, they experience more drag, which gets them lower until they do not have enough speed and come burning back through the atmosphere. Some studies have argued that it was a series of magnetic effects from the first and subsequent minor storms that caused the falling, even though some storms happened after most of the satellites had already burned up.

A different team, as reported by spaceweather.com, suggests that the effect on the atmosphere was not caused by the storms, but a more complex magnetic event in the Sun.

The Sun has an 11-year cycle of activity that goes from minimum to minimum via a peak of activity known as the solar maximum. We have just passed that for solar cycle 25.

The Sun also has a 22-year-long cycle of magnetic activity known as the Hale cycle. It’s the length of two solar cycles, and that is because the Sun reverses its magnetic field every 11 years. Two crucial features come into play in the Hale cycle. One is the formation of magnetic donuts around 55 degrees of latitude on both hemispheres of the Sun. These donuts move towards the equator over time, and they eventually cancel each other out in an event called the "terminator" – not to be confused with the time-traveling robot or the line between day and night.

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (8)

“In a nutshell, the ‘terminator’ event is the final death throes of those canceling magnetic donuts,” Dr Scott McIntosh, deputy director of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, told IFLScience in 2023.

McIntosh and team were studying the terminator to better predict Solar Cycle 25. Their prediction was different from the official prediction, which expected a weak solar maximum peaking in 2024. They expected an active one, peaking early with over 210 sunspots at maximum. It peaked in October 2024 with 216 sunspots.

The terminator event took place in December 2021, and the argument is that the solar flux would not have been in line with the prediction. In a different paper, also discussing how to deal with drag on satellites, Scott Shambaugh from Capella Space discusses how the terminator model gave a better prediction for the solar flux.

The geomagnetic storms can still create short increases in densities, but they do not explain it all. The Sun is the best-studied star, and yet there is still so much that we do not know about how it works – but we are trying our best to do so.

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED

ARTICLE POSTED IN

Space and PhysicsAstronomy

  • The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (11)
  • SpaceX,

  • Astronomy,

  • solar maximum,

  • starlink,

  • solar cycle 25,

  • hale cycle

Email AppEnvelope

FOLLOW ONNEWSThe "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (12)

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (13)

More Space and Physics Stories

link to article

"Black Hole Bomb": Energy-Stealing Zel’dovich Effect Confirmed In The Lab

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (14)

physics

"Black Hole Bomb": Energy-Stealing Zel’dovich Effect Confirmed In The Lab

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (16)3 hours ago

link to article

"Optimizing Mechanism": Physicist Claims Gravity Is Evidence We May Be In A Simulation

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (17)

Space and Physics

"Optimizing Mechanism": Physicist Claims Gravity Is Evidence We May Be In A Simulation

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (19)4 hours ago

link to article

There’s An Enormous "Glow In The Dark" Cloud Of Gas We Never Noticed Remarkably Close To Earth

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (20)

Astronomy

There’s An Enormous "Glow In The Dark" Cloud Of Gas We Never Noticed Remarkably Close To Earth

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's Satellites (22)7 hours ago

The "Terminator" Might Have Killed Off Elon Musk's  Satellites (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Madonna Wisozk

Last Updated:

Views: 6075

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (48 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Madonna Wisozk

Birthday: 2001-02-23

Address: 656 Gerhold Summit, Sidneyberg, FL 78179-2512

Phone: +6742282696652

Job: Customer Banking Liaison

Hobby: Flower arranging, Yo-yoing, Tai chi, Rowing, Macrame, Urban exploration, Knife making

Introduction: My name is Madonna Wisozk, I am a attractive, healthy, thoughtful, faithful, open, vivacious, zany person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.